Featured Posts

No longer on 6PR?No longer on 6PR? For the last 2 weeks, the second most common search term people type into Google to bring them to my blog is a variant of: www.google.com.au/search?q=jason+jordan+no+longer+on+6pr So I figure I should...

Read more

Left-Handers die youngerLeft-Handers die younger Again today. Most of the time it's not that much of an issue as you just adapt. But when it makes life more difficult it really makes me snippy. So let's start with pens. Find one with a logo...

Read more

My Multiple Sclerosis. April Update.My Multiple Sclerosis. April Update. Some months back I wrote about my experiences with Multiple Sclerosis to date. I think it's time for an update. From what I can see & feel, there has been no serious progression of the disease....

Read more

I have Multiple SclerosisI have Multiple Sclerosis I don't hide away from the fact that I have a disease called Multiple Sclerosis - commonly referred to as MS. There seems to be a lot of ignorance around this disease - and that's to be expected. It's...

Read more

Kiva - Microloans to help beat povertyKiva - Microloans to help beat poverty I just made a loan to someone in Mozambique using a revolutionary new website called Kiva (www.kiva.org). My loaner page is here: http://www.kiva.org/lender/jasonjordan You can go to Kiva's website...

Read more

The Wright Brothers weren’t first?

Posted by jas | Posted in Rants | Posted on 24-06-2002

View Comments

Who’s to believe what you read on the Net? A bigger bunch of liars and buffoons you’ll never meet.

Nonetheless… in my travels I happened across an interesting argument.

A New Zealander was first to pilot a heavier-than-air aircraft.

So is there a Smithsonian Conspiracy to lie to the world about who really did fly first?

“The executors of Orville Wright’s estate entered into a contract with the Smithsonian [Institute] for the display of the aircraft which dealt with, among other – things, the wording to be used on the accompanying plaque. Paragraph 2 (d) of the Agreement reads:

“Neither the Smithsonian Institution or its successors, nor any museum or other agency, bureau or facilities administered for the United States of America by the Smithsonian Institution or its successors shall publish or permit to be displayed a statement or label in connection with or in respect of any aircraft model or design of earlier date than the Wright Aeroplane of 1903, claiming in effect that such aircraft was capable of carrying a man under its own power in controlled flight.”

“Failure to observe this condition by the Smithsonian would result in a return of the “Flyer” to the vendors, according to paragraph 4 of the contract.

“The implication is clear. By trading its integrity for an aeroplane, the Smithsonian one of the most prestigious public institutions in the world, was condemning Gustave Whitehead [and by inference also condeming all other early aviation pioneers including Richard Pearse of New Zealand - CJB] to obscurity.”

Go here: http://chrisbrady.itgo.com/pearse/pearse.htm
or here: http://chrisbrady.itgo.com/pearse/smithsonian.htm

blog comments powered by Disqus

jasonjordan.com.au

Bear